

0.5
Founded 1870, policies from same era?
Essentially cricket training and spectating venue with entertaining space separate hired out to public, when doing so spectators / parents have to use the disabled WC as access to public wcs is on 1st floor which is where the entertainment hall is. Hence queue for Wc, as numerous parents/ siblings use disabled Wc. They can’t use the ones on the changing rooms due to safeguarding policy, which is totally understandable but to remove access to the public ones on first floor is ludicrous and puts unacceptable volume through the disabled Wc. It was pointed out there are 2 disabled wcs. So I suggested two disabled persons wouldn’t need use at the same time? Also, second disabled Wc is through a set of heavy hinged fire doors.
Disabled bays constantly used by others or People park at top of the pedestrian slope preventing chair access so they can wheel their sports equipment down
Essentially cricket training and spectating venue with entertaining space separate hired out to public, when doing so spectators / parents have to use the disabled WC as access to public wcs is on 1st floor which is where the entertainment hall is. Hence queue for Wc, as numerous parents/ siblings use disabled Wc. They can’t use the ones on the changing rooms due to safeguarding policy, which is totally understandable but to remove access to the public ones on first floor is ludicrous and puts unacceptable volume through the disabled Wc. It was pointed out there are 2 disabled wcs. So I suggested two disabled persons wouldn’t need use at the same time? Also, second disabled Wc is through a set of heavy hinged fire doors.
Disabled bays constantly used by others or People park at top of the pedestrian slope preventing chair access so they can wheel their sports equipment down